Canongraphers
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to CanonGraphers. Enjoy your stay here!

Click here to access the gallery
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: 2nd take at Changi boardwalk  (Read 1807 times)
cmeptb
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 152


WWW
« on: September 30, 2007, 12:19:06 AM »
Hi there.

Managed to have another go at Changi boardwalk a couple of weeks back. Resorted ro using colured grad filters as the skies were drab.





All C&C welcome.
Logged
hasta la victoria siempre!!!
kel
Committee
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 468
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2007, 04:59:17 PM »
alot of noise on #1??look so grainy...
happened on #2 also...look at the top of the photo...

i dont think collour filter will cause all this..maybe u have over DI ...
Logged
Shot & Shot....
+evenstar
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 642
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2007, 06:43:33 PM »
i would say the images are overpixellated. did you resize them to smaller then larger?
Logged
We'd really rather not moderate, but comments that are highly inflammatory, inappropriate or plain inane may suffer the inglorious fate of being deleted. Let's be constructive!
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 781
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2007, 09:38:21 PM »
Could be a result of high ISO?
Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2007, 09:40:41 PM »
its not, its jaggly which indicates expansion of small image.
Logged
hexazona · crumenatum · galleria botanica
cmeptb
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 152


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2007, 10:45:06 PM »
Thanks for viewing, guys.

Ya, the 2nd image was heaviliy cropped to remove unwanted elements but the 1st pic was cropped only 5-10%. Should have used a longer lens  Sad

Pardon the noob question, what's DI - ?
Logged
hasta la victoria siempre!!!
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2007, 11:43:35 PM »
even the first one, you can see all the pixelation artefact on the rocks, the edge of the boat, clouds, etc. you used too much compression?
Logged
hexazona · crumenatum · galleria botanica
cmeptb
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 152


WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2007, 01:04:40 PM »
no leh. i took the pics in raw format & then extracted the jpeg in least compressed format. can over-sharpening result in pixelation?

strange thing is that the pictures were cropped but were not resized upwards.
Logged
hasta la victoria siempre!!!
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2007, 01:21:45 PM »
I do not think sharpening will cause pixelation. sharpening artefact is more like pimply spots.
Logged
hexazona · crumenatum · galleria botanica
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 781
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2007, 11:46:46 AM »
The pics did shows signs of over sharpening. When over sharpen, you get this "glowing" effect around your subjects.
Logged
cmeptb
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 152


WWW
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2007, 11:33:26 PM »


A retake on pic 1 but without the over-sharpening.

Does this work better & what are the other things I should work on for the pic to nake the cut? Huh
Logged
hasta la victoria siempre!!!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Theme by S e r s e r i. Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC MySQL | PHP | XHTML | CSS
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 17 queries.