Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Welcome to CanonGraphers. Enjoy your stay here!
Click here to access the
gallery
Canongraphers
>
Discussion Corner
>
Photo Gear Talk
>
Which is a better tripod?
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Which is a better tripod? (Read 2672 times)
michelle11
ShutterBug
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 19
Which is a better tripod?
«
on:
April 29, 2007, 12:34:26 PM »
The Slik pro or benbo?
Logged
michelle11
ShutterBug
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 19
Tripod recommendations
«
Reply #1 on:
April 29, 2007, 12:46:04 PM »
hi, all the senior, hope to have your advise.
Which tripod is better? Slik pro or benbo?
I just started photography 2 week ago, so need advise.
Logged
CanonGrapher
Global Moderator
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Posts: 563
Editor-in-Chief, CanonGraphers
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #2 on:
April 29, 2007, 12:48:01 PM »
Quote from: michelle11 on April 29, 2007, 12:34:26 PM
The Slik pro or benbo?
I will go with a Slik.
But personally, if you do not mind the price tag, go with a Gitzo, or at least a Manfrotto.
Slik is ok.
Logged
Editor-in-Chief, CanonGraphers
Please feel free to PM me if you have any questions, suggestions, comments or complaints related to the forum.
jediforce4ever
~documentary photographer~
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1315
Re: Tripod recommendations
«
Reply #3 on:
April 29, 2007, 12:57:16 PM »
Hi michelle, to keep the outing thread tidy, I split your post out to another topic.Hope you wont mind =)
Logged
Denosha
CanonGrapher
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 119
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #4 on:
April 29, 2007, 03:56:43 PM »
I think it also depends what you want to use ur tripod for? Each brand will have low to high end offerings anyway so maybe you might want to compare specific models instead.
Logged
My Photo blog
|
Photo gallery
|
My music profile
jediforce4ever
~documentary photographer~
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1315
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #5 on:
April 29, 2007, 05:37:59 PM »
I got the Victory 1000(imitation manfrotto) for $130 from TCW.Incl head.
Quite a steady tripod.Served me well so far.
The Manfrotto 055Pro can be had for around that price too.But its much heavier.Tho much steadier.
Logged
UKay
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Posts: 1405
Love... Fame & Fortune...
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #6 on:
April 29, 2007, 05:51:27 PM »
I will go with a manfrotto any day. It save lives.. literally...
Logged
Whatever turns you on...
www.ukayphotography.com
michelle11
ShutterBug
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 19
Re: Tripod recommendations
«
Reply #7 on:
April 29, 2007, 08:19:29 PM »
Quote from: jediforce4ever on April 29, 2007, 12:57:16 PM
Hi michelle, to keep the outing thread tidy, I split your post out to another topic.Hope you wont mind =)
No, problem. thanks.
Logged
michelle11
ShutterBug
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 19
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #8 on:
April 29, 2007, 08:20:26 PM »
Quote from: jediforce4ever on April 29, 2007, 05:37:59 PM
I got the Victory 1000(imitation manfrotto) for $130 from TCW.Incl head.
Quite a steady tripod.Served me well so far.
The Manfrotto 055Pro can be had for around that price too.But its much heavier.Tho much steadier.
So manfrotto is better?
Logged
michelle11
ShutterBug
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 19
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #9 on:
April 29, 2007, 08:25:51 PM »
Quote from: Denosha on April 29, 2007, 03:56:43 PM
I think it also depends what you want to use ur tripod for? Each brand will have low to high end offerings anyway so maybe you might want to compare specific models instead.
i am looking for something for macro works. Height of about 1.6 to 1.7 at least. Can't be too heavy as i am a lady. ( Afraid no strength, haha....)
Budget,
but hope not too costly as just spend a lot on lens.
Weight , i am not sure, at the moment, just bought a 400D canon, 17-50mm lens, 100mm macro. in future wants to add, wide lens, zooms lens, flash & etc. So don't know how the weight needed?
Thanks for your help, sorry not good with it. Thanks.
Logged
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher
Offline
Posts: 3266
i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #10 on:
April 29, 2007, 08:43:43 PM »
truth be told, a 400D with a macro lens and a 580EX flash on top at best weighs so little, any ol tripod can handle it.
but if you're going low, down and dirty, i'd say a cheap entry would be a manfrotto tripod with a giottos ballhead.
Logged
absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
jediforce4ever
~documentary photographer~
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1315
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #11 on:
April 29, 2007, 10:36:51 PM »
If you're goin low.Make sure your tripod and head is steady enough to keep your camera at the same spot when you let go of it.Macro needs that amount of precision.ALso, note to get one that allows you to lift the legs up to lower the contre or gravity of the tripod.
Logged
doubletaps
ShutterBug
Offline
Posts: 10
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #12 on:
October 18, 2007, 09:07:40 PM »
Hi,
Anyone has recommendations for a tripod + ballhead? Any place in particular that has a wide variety?
Budget: $200-300
Weight: Not an issue as i would rather have something heavy and sturdy.
Setup: 20D + 70-200 would be the heaviest (would like something future-proof also if possible in case BBB virus hits)
Height: I am around 1.65m. Would like tripod + ballhead + cam to be around eye level without extending center column.
I was looking at either the Manfrotto 055/190 series for the legs. Anyone has recommendation on ballheads or seen anywhere with a decent package deal?
Was thinking of going down to CP this weekend to try try buy buy....but hopefully by doing research in advance i wont cry cry when i get home.
Thanks!
PS: Other brands are fine too as long as they fit into budget. I am open to anything.
Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1859
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #13 on:
October 18, 2007, 09:22:15 PM »
Quote from: Michael on April 29, 2007, 08:43:43 PM
truth be told, a 400D with a macro lens and a 580EX flash on top at best weighs so little, any ol tripod can handle it.
but if you're going low, down and dirty, i'd say a cheap entry would be a manfrotto tripod with a giottos ballhead.
if you are mounted with a flash, why don't just hand hold?
Logged
hexazona
·
crumenatum
·
galleria botanica
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher
Offline
Posts: 781
Re: Which is a better tripod?
«
Reply #14 on:
October 18, 2007, 10:48:42 PM »
I am using a Manfrotto 190, with benro head...just about there with 1D and 70-200 F2.8 and flash.Cost should be about $300 or less.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> News | Announcements
===> Singapore News
=> Events | Gatherings | Workshops
=> Chit Chat Corner
-----------------------------
Photo Sharing and Critique Corner
-----------------------------
=> Portraits
=> Travel and Landscape
=> Nature, Wildlife and Macro
=> Sports, Events, Weddings and Photojournalism
=> Still Life | Abstracts | B/W | Macro
=> Our Photo Appreciation
=> Picture of the Month Gallery
-----------------------------
Discussion Corner
-----------------------------
=> Lens Reviews
=> Photo Gear Talk
=> EOS Digital SLRs & EOS SLRs
=> EF and EF-S Mount Lenses
=> Powershot | Ixus Digital Cameras
=> Digital Video Cameras
=> Shooting Techniques
=> Post Processing Techniques
Loading...