Canongraphers
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to CanonGraphers. Enjoy your stay here!

Click here to access the gallery
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Canon mounts for CZ, Leica, FD?  (Read 1367 times)
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT


« on: August 19, 2008, 01:55:08 PM »

I'm just curious as to whether one is able to mount other old manual lenses from Carl Zeiss, Leica or Canon's FD series onto the current EOS bodies. I have reason to believe that adaptors are available for that purpose, but what about any problems that might occur if that happens?

I think FD mounts after adding adaptors, even when mounting on EOS bodies, there will be a problem focussing to infinity? Unless one shaves ever so slighty, the barrel, bringing the rear element closer to the sensor?
Logged

absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2008, 02:00:12 PM »

typical problem is focusing to infinity which is patently obvious when you use a split image focusing screen. prepare to pay a lot of a really good adapter.
Logged

Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT


« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2008, 04:18:06 PM »

I'm more worried about the rear element to sensor might be further, leading in closer focusing (macro?) but losing the infinity focusing. How can an adaptor make the rear elements closer to the sensor? Unless we're talking about a very thin adaptor or one that has a rear glass or something?
Logged

absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2008, 05:13:56 PM »

thats why the good adaptors must be made from good strong materials (as it needs to be thin) and finely machined.
Logged

Dream Merchant
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 709


« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2008, 03:58:48 AM »

Mikey ... bit by bit ...

Canon FD lenses: you'll need a very high quality (rare - v rare and ex - b prepared to spend at least SGD250-300) adapter with a glass element inside to ensure focus at infinity.

CZ (which range? There were NUMEROUS!). OK, let's assume the more popular CZ C/Y AEs or MMs - Offers outstanding image quality when used with a good adapter. I once used a rented combo of CZ C/Y 28mm f/2.8, Fotodiox manual adapter on a 5D, and the JPEG files straight-out-of-cam looked so much like processed files!

DEPENDING on WHICH lens, some, especially the wider ones MAY have a deeper rear flange, and that's gonna slam yr 5D mirror. Most users either file this down, or if possible, remove. You really have to do the research for exactly WHICH lense, because, as mentioned earlier, CZ and even the C/Y have many variants.

LEITZ R. Pretty much the same as the CZ range.

Note: for the CZ C/Y and LEITZ range, generally, you do NOT need an adapter with a glass element to achieve infinity focus. Also try to select non-chipped adapters.

Some of the best adapters cost between US $150 - $300, but these will allow you to fully realise the amazing optical qualities of these old world lenses. Unless yr a hard-core user of manual lenses, try the Fotodiox Pro range. They seem to offer competent quality at slightly lees than USD100 per fully manual adapter. In case yr wondering, minute machning differences as well as plano-parallell QC if fairly crucial to top quality results and consistency. BUT, be prepared for one fact - you need to MATCH each adapter to EACH lense. Just like precision target pistols/rifles and choice of ammunition, they can be finicky and have their own fave combinations. It's usually NOT a case of one adapter fits all.

IF yu get a competent adapter, and chose your lenses carefully, some, if not most of these old lenses can easily beat any Canon L lense.   I have one Zuiko OM lens ... cheap budget shit, that outresolves the EF 100mm macro, with the Zuiko WIDE open, and the EF macro STOPPED-DOWN!!!!!  Cost of this lens? About $100 in superb condition, and about $50 in a beat up condition. Mine IS beat up, and still outperforms the EF Macro lense!  respect  My 1st Edition Vivitar Series 1 lens, when closed down say half to one stop, and IF it's properly mounted (adapter issues), can FULLY MATCH my 702002.8. You could get that Vivitar lens for typically about US$50 - $100 these days.




IF you are really serious about getting into the wonderful but sometimes frustrating world of old manual lenses, let me know. IF yr serious, cos it's going to take quite a bit of effort and dedication on yr part to achieve optimal results.
Logged
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT


« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2008, 12:02:05 PM »

Looking for manual lenses, depending what you have. Cheesy
Logged

absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
benny
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 146


WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2008, 03:00:57 PM »

I've mounted the Leica Elmarit 100mm f/2.8 APO Macro on the Canon and the results aren't too bad. Ask Hwchoy. He's had fun with this setup.

Now I'm looking to try mounting the Rollei Planar 80mm f/2.8 HFT on the Canon. This medium format lens was well received by many, but options for 35mm was limited until the last few years.

Cheers,
Logged
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT


« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2008, 10:59:29 AM »

tempting la... how's Contax 85/1.4
Logged

absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 19 queries.