Canongraphers
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to CanonGraphers. Enjoy your stay here!

Click here to access the gallery
 
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Alternative Focusing Screens  (Read 2687 times)
All Blue
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 58


« Reply #15 on: February 29, 2008, 11:09:31 AM »

well, i might try it as i'm have problem focusing right now even with those AF chip adatper.
Logged
All Blue
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 58


« Reply #16 on: February 29, 2008, 11:12:10 AM »

Ec-B may not be as easy to focus as Ec-A or Ec-L. if simplicity is what you are looking at then there'll be a trade off.

Err dun tink anyone here has tried this particular supply yet.

Perssonally speaking, the Ec-B grid looks like something I could really use.

U wanna try one first and let us know?  giggling...
Logged
Dream Merchant
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 709


« Reply #17 on: February 29, 2008, 11:20:05 AM »

Hmm ... why not? Is there something different with the Canon based split-image?
Logged
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT


« Reply #18 on: February 29, 2008, 11:24:39 AM »

dont get the Ec-B

the horizontal line only, focusing thingy , is not worth getting

at least minimum is the Ec-L
coz it has two lines, vertical and horizontal
Logged

absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
Dream Merchant
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 709


« Reply #19 on: February 29, 2008, 11:54:20 AM »

I grew up on the horizontal and 45 deg split-image as well as plain ground glass with grids and oiled ground glass and only a central focusing aid.

The two-way split may be more precise, but under most everyday shooting circumstances, I would imagine it to be too 'slow' to use because you're now looking at two planes to confirm focus. I figure it can get pretty confusing as well if you're shooting anything other than clean, straight lines. But that's just thinking in theory ah...
Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #20 on: February 29, 2008, 12:02:00 PM »

the one I am using has a 45° split with micro prisms ringing.
Logged

Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT


« Reply #21 on: February 29, 2008, 12:07:01 PM »

the one I am using has a 45° split with micro prisms ringing.

45º ones are the best. love those...
tried them before in film camera of the past...
Logged

absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #22 on: February 29, 2008, 12:11:10 PM »

actually when I bought mine I have a choice of horizontal or 45, obviously I picked 45.
Logged

Dream Merchant
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 709


« Reply #23 on: February 29, 2008, 12:59:15 PM »

Strangely, while I tend to tilt the cam sometimes when I can't see a line that helps me with a horizontal, I still stick with the horizontal. Most of the time, the horizontal works fine for me. It's only that 'sometimes' that I need a tilted split.

BTW, if splits are your thing, you should have checked out the screens that came with the F-1n bods. Dual angled split or varied rake angle or something like that - one facet hadles fast lenses, while another takes over with slow lenses so you don't get that blackening-out effect even with lenses like 5.6 or 6.5 - it's still perfectly clear. Sometimes, I miss that camera.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.439 seconds with 18 queries.