Canongraphers
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to CanonGraphers. Enjoy your stay here!

Click here to access the gallery
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM - discussion  (Read 1258 times)
benny
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 146


WWW
« on: January 08, 2008, 05:50:44 PM »
I heard good things about this lens from uncle choy too. Anyone has comparison images to show the differences?

Cheers,
« Last Edit: January 09, 2008, 10:54:55 PM by victor » Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2008, 05:52:20 PM »
flare control is amazing, plus sharpness and colour saturation under harsh lighting at wide open is still
Logged
hexazona · crumenatum · galleria botanica
benny
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 146


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2008, 06:32:02 PM »
And the 24 mm is crap? Any 24 vs 35 mm IQ comparison?

Cheers,
Logged
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2008, 07:15:50 PM »
which 24mm are u talking about?
Logged
absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
benny
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 146


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2008, 07:41:19 PM »
f/1.4 L USM
Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2008, 07:43:58 PM »
what happened to the starting post? anyway I used benny's 24/1.4L also in a stage performance settings, it was a bit too wide for the purpose and I was new to those things then. but it didn't give me the same ooomph as the 35/1.4L did.
Logged
hexazona · crumenatum · galleria botanica
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2008, 07:48:21 PM »
oh. if i were to choose, i'd get the 35/1.4 anytime...

it's nothing to do with IQ
it's got everything to do that when u first look at the picture, you go "wow."
Logged
absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
jediforce4ever
~documentary photographer~
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1315
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2008, 07:59:57 PM »
35mm is good on FF.Not too wide and not too much distortion.
Logged
Michael
Committee
Legendary CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 3266


i SHOOT, therefore i PRINT
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2008, 10:59:37 PM »
although you are looking for comparisons, let me know if you just want to see an individual photo shot on the 35L...

and i also did some checking with my trusty canon book, it seems that the lw/ph of the 24mm is a lot higher, meaning more resolution... hmmm...
Logged
absolute power corrupts absolutely. canon is powerful and corrupted my CF card.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Theme by S e r s e r i. Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC MySQL | PHP | XHTML | CSS
Page created in 0.141 seconds with 18 queries.