Canongraphers
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to CanonGraphers. Enjoy your stay here!

Click here to access the gallery
 
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 40D vs 1d MKII vs 1D MK III...  (Read 2937 times)
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 781


« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2007, 12:35:20 PM »

Okay basically the live view....It also have A-Dep and 3 Customise function which is very useful when you move from indoor to outdoor shoot. I am also waiting for the wifi grip.
Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2007, 01:52:05 PM »

the 20D already have A-Dep what. is it improved?
Logged

boredphuck
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1011


"Assumptions is the mother of all f*ck ups."


WWW
« Reply #17 on: December 13, 2007, 04:50:41 PM »

sorry to hijack but comparing the 5D and its possible replacement next yr, how does the IQ compares to the 1D Mk III. Let's say shooting portraits.
Logged

"It requires less character to discover the faults of others than is does to tolerate them." - J. Petit Senn
sk.images
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 150


« Reply #18 on: December 13, 2007, 06:43:58 PM »

sorry to hijack but comparing the 5D and its possible replacement next yr, how does the IQ compares to the 1D Mk III. Let's say shooting portraits.

By all current reports, high ISO noise is comprable.  Colours are truer on the MkIII, but tones are smoother on the 5D.  Unless you're doing massive enlargements there will be a bigger e=impact from post processing then the output from the individual cameras.
Logged
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 781


« Reply #19 on: December 13, 2007, 09:22:09 PM »

the 20D already have A-Dep what. is it improved?

1D don't have...so to me is something new...
Logged
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 781


« Reply #20 on: December 13, 2007, 09:24:05 PM »

By all current reports, high ISO noise is comprable.  Colours are truer on the MkIII, but tones are smoother on the 5D.  Unless you're doing massive enlargements there will be a bigger e=impact from post processing then the output from the individual cameras.

Provided you shoot RAW all the time...JPEG only works on 8bit.
Logged
evershine
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1005



WWW
« Reply #21 on: December 13, 2007, 10:58:29 PM »

I find that there's a lot of difference in jpeg quality for 1DmkII and 350D. But for 350D in RAW then it is quite close or better compare to 1DmkII jpeg. I am comparing all these on screen and that's what i perceive/recall.

Provided you shoot RAW all the time...JPEG only works on 8bit.
Logged
jediforce4ever
~documentary photographer~
Committee
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1315



« Reply #22 on: December 14, 2007, 08:55:00 PM »

1D don't have...so to me is something new...
You don't need A-DEP...to me, its just like a dummy mode.I've never touched it since I got my camera...
Logged
hwchoy
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1859



WWW
« Reply #23 on: December 14, 2007, 09:42:21 PM »

yeah me too, never could figure out to work it properly.
Logged

Kwanon
CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 190


« Reply #24 on: December 14, 2007, 10:14:20 PM »

You don't need A-DEP...to me, its just like a dummy mode.I've never touched it since I got my camera...

that's not in my dictionary/
Logged
victor
Administrator
Senior CanonGrapher

Offline Offline

Posts: 781


« Reply #25 on: December 15, 2007, 01:13:20 AM »

Although I also don'tuse A-Dep...but is still something new....anyway...the live view do offer new shooting opp.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 17 queries.