Disclaimer: If you're a rabid Canon fanboy, please avoid reading this thread as it contains realities you might find disturbing...
Yeah, anyway, my reason for posting this is to share my personal experience, especially with those who have yet to chance upon the infamous "Bad copy". On to the story...
2 weeks ago my friend and I received our 24-70Ls from B&H. And BOTH lens were basically bad copies right out of the box. My friend’s one was back-focusing significantly, especially at 24mm and mine was not only mis-focusing but also soft at 70mm. Anyway, both lenses were sent in for calibration (international warranty!

) now both fixed! Mine seems VERY sharp at 70mm now.

24-70L before calibration <70mm F2.8>

(100% crop)

Same subject, distance, settings with the 70-200 F2.8L IS <70mm F2.8>
100% crop, HUGE difference huh?

24-70L after calibration <70mm F2.8>

100% crop, MUCH MUCH MUCH better huh? Oh, the focus was on the eye but the fur detail looks better here
So I guess those damn L bad copies are still out there. Luckily calibration will fix ‘em (most of them at least). The lady said they only had to do electronic adjustments on the lens.
The moral of the story is... check your lenses, even if they are expensive Ls, before buying to make sure they are not lemons. If you can't check or it isn't convenient (like in the case of buying them online like me), make sure that you have warranty that will cover any calibration or (touch wood) repairs you might have to do.